For all who want to begin something new
“My beginning consists of thorns”
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Pichler describes the necessity of a change of paradigm: “We are confronted with uncontrollable, unsteerable dynamic processes that in their complexity can only be understood in parts. The helplessness of managers, organizers, teachers,… shows impressively, that linear, causal control models have become obsolete.”
MathEthics has the new control model in it:
- MathEthics is the theory and practice of making the central challenges of future control works understandable and workable, by skillfully differentiating between operational unity (autoposiesis) and flexible edge layers.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice of enforcing an increase of complexity, because it operates the skillful processing of complexity.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice of representing the change of paradigm.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice that knows about the meaning of adequate structural conditions and the development of new personal and social competences.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice that can accompany process-oriented forms of development.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice whose orientiation to gain knowledge works through change of perspective.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice that makes analysis of and with social systems accessible.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice that fully includes man.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice that at any given time can access its sustainable operations through simple intelligent forms of quality control.
- MathEthics is the theory and practice that deliberately connects encoding and decoding with cybernetics second order (“CybernEthics”).
- MathEthics is the theory and practice that always brings the everyday life of involved people in reciprocation with society.
- MathEthics means the parting of handed down mental working methods and illusions of feasibility.
Prof. Dr. Hans Lenk:
“It’s necessary to develop a renewed philosophy of humanity and to launch it into public efficacy. It has to be a philosophy of humaneness and humanity, that doesn’t avoid “too humaneness” but far rather takes it serious.”
That’s what MathEthics can achieve, if we want it to.